How to Test an Idea: MVP Vs POC Vs Prototype

Many tools are available to check the app’s efficiency while you develop an application. The development procedure starts with the POC phase. Then prototype and lead to MVP. All these tools and phases help to check the efficiency of the designs. Additionally, these help administrators to arrange their fundamental ideas. Hence, understanding of all these phases is important for your success today.

Proof of Concept (POC)

Proof of Concept is abbreviated as POC. It is an approach that enterprises use to endorse the workability and idea of the concept. Before the app development, the POC is used to confirm the potential ideas. It is available at low cost and is a powerful tool to test the under-developing apps at the early stages. We can talk after understanding the POC meaning that it is supposed to be an excellent option for low cost and better efficiency. POC is an excellent option to get results in a short time with limited resources. 

Prototype (PT)

The Prototype is abbreviated as PT and usually applies to check the application’s design, whether it is useful to the final user or not. It is an essential tool to determine the performance of the app as well as its functions. PT helps to demonstrate the improvement of an application in its initial stages. It gives many ideas about the features and functions of the application. PT also enhances the development of an application at initial phases.

Minimum Viable Product (MVP)

Minimum Viable Product is abbreviated as MVP. It keeps the best features that help to develop the application conveniently. After knowing the MVP meaning, the presentation of the application becomes best. The MVP development process helps verify the team’s opinions about the application, efficiency, availability, and conventional use. Constructing the MVP helps in developing the app to accumulate user’s positive feedback.

Pilot

The Pilot is smaller than a full-scale implementation. You can do a live demonstration if you endeavor with the free version of Pilot. It means that it may be costly at some stage of testing. It can also give many answers to the questions and solve problems related to the application.

The manufacturer has to invest a lot of energy, time, and resources for its amplification. After investing, it can’t provide services that could ever meet the requirements of the builder. This method provides results, but they are not correct for the clients. That is why they may argue with you about the problems. So, Pilot is, unfortunately, the worst method to proceed. It is not friendly at all in hard times.

POC vs Pilot – Features

Concerning scope and size, there is a clear difference between POC and the Pilot. We already know that what is POC in reality. The POC stands for Proof of Concept, so it follows the rules and performs well to develop an app. The POC emphasizes even a tiny piece of the solution. It also makes many possibilities to minimize the challenges and enhance the results. 

Proof of Concept Example 

Suppose a company wants to launch its product to understand the hidden flaws. They will use POC, which keeps the feature to capture errors. In this way, the companies will know the deficiencies and qualities to make the best product. POC is cheaper and more affordable than Pilot. Many of the companies prefer POC as compared to others.

The Pilot’s scope is vaster than POC, but it is regarded as smaller than a full-scale implementation. You can do a live demonstration; if you endeavor with the free version of Pilot. It means that it may be costly at some stages of testing. It can also give many answers to the questions and solve problems related to the application.

It is now clear that the manufacturer should choose the appropriate Pilot and POC implementations. The selection should be according to the requirements of the company.

Proof of Concept vs Prototype – Features

POC is Proof of concept, and the other one is PT, known as Prototype. If we talk about Proof of Concept Vs Prototype, they have different functions and expressions. Both give results according to the requirements during the life cycle of converting apps during its development.

The POC is a useful tool that is used to demonstrate and test the application’s design, which is under-development. This also helps to support the product concept that leads to the best achievements of better results. The POC is designed to verify the system and characteristics of the application. It is also designed to judge its deficiency in the earlier stages of development. It is available at an affordable cost. That is why the companies mostly prefer this to identify the product’s features before further development. 

On the other hand, Prototyping possesses quick responses and provides an effective way to determine an app’s deficient features. This helps in the assembly of documents and gives a proper estimation of time of how long this will take for compilation.

By comparing both of these tools, we came to know that POC has potential and a tendency to judge something big, which may work as a barrier to the development of the application. On the other hand, Prototyping lacks technical feasibility and has an unrefined output at the time of giving final products.

POC vs PT vs MVP

These three tools are individually discussed above, and we came to know about their concepts. Still, the comparisons of POC Vs PT Vs MVP are necessary to recognize them appropriately. The following graph shows a clear difference between all of them.

Which tool to select?

To check the under-development apps’ requirements, you should have a choice to pick one of the tools, which can give the best results at the end. For this, one should deeply look at these tools’ features, one by one, to choose the correct tool wisely according to the requirements. 

Select MVP When:

• You require the highest retention on a low budget.
• You have to show a working app for clients.
• You know the market perception to improve the application for development purposes.
• Your goal is to make an attractive amount of money.

Select POC When:

• Seed-stage funding is needed.
• You want to check if your ideas are working well or not.
• You want to share internal information and scenarios with your team.
• You want an approach that features successfully in a fast way.

Select Prototype When:

• There is a shortage of technical approaches and availability.
• Money and time are limited, and you want to show your products to the client as soon as possible.
• You have a short time to look out for your application.

Conclusions

From learning many aspects of POC Vs PT Vs MVP, we conclude that every tool has different features that can be used according to the requirements. No single tool is the winner of the article because every tool is needed according to the conditions.

These methods are cost-efficient and very quick to learn the lacking features and characteristics of the app. All these tools help to enhance the improvements regarding apps that need to be developed in a short time. This article gives many beneficial ideas to increase the efficiency of applications in the market.

They all provide the services from which the app’s manufacturer may earn in large quantities and make the customers happier. These tools ensure that everyone, i.e., manufacturers, stakeholders, clients, and team, is on the same forum. They also help to eliminate typical mistakes and recover them immediately for better results.

Each method is supposed to be advantageous because it provides winning over clients, valid marketing, and testing critical business concepts. All these can produce remarkable and useful results, which lead to success. With a piece of better information and understanding with PTs, POCs, and MVPs, you will be able to prevent and cover the mistakes to increase your chances of success. We hope this article will be helpful to everyone.